<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chandler Writes. You Profit. &#187; integrity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chandlerwrites.com/tag/integrity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chandlerwrites.com</link>
	<description>If you want words, hire any copywriter. If you want success, hire me.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 04:39:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tom Chandler Quoted in BrandWeek Article About Deceptive Mailing Practices</title>
		<link>http://chandlerwrites.com/2008/04/16/tom-chandler-quoted-in-brandweek-article-about-deceptive-mailing-practices/</link>
		<comments>http://chandlerwrites.com/2008/04/16/tom-chandler-quoted-in-brandweek-article-about-deceptive-mailing-practices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Chandler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[copywriting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[integrity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chandlerwrites.com/2008/04/16/tom-chandler-quoted-in-brandweek-article-about-deceptive-mailing-practices/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve written a lot of direct response over the course of my 22+ year career, and I&#8217;ve always been an outspoken critic of deceptive mailing practices, believing they harm all marketers in the long run. That&#8217;s why BrandWeek sought me out when they wrote a story about the growing practice of deceptive mailers. While they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve written a lot of direct response over the course of my 22+ year career, and I&#8217;ve always been an outspoken critic of deceptive mailing practices, believing they harm all marketers in the long run.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.brandweek.com/bw/search/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003714620" target="_blank"><img style="border-width: 0px" src="http://chandlerwrites.com/images/TomChandlerQuotedinBrandWeekArticleAbout_96F5/image.png" border="0" alt="Brandweek header" width="244" height="195" /></a></p>
<p>That&#8217;s why BrandWeek sought me out when they <a href="http://www.brandweek.com/bw/search/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003714620" target="_blank">wrote a story about the growing practice of deceptive mailers</a>. While they quoted me several times, this quote received prominent play:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;What I don&#8217;t understand is why organizations allow deceptive practices to undermine their carefully [and expensively] cultivated brand images in the first place,&#8221; said Chandler. &#8220;I recently received a series of envelopes from a large credit-card bank where I held an account. All shared the same alarmist stamp that &#8220;Important Information&#8221; about his account was enclosed. &#8220;Of course, it wasn&#8217;t important information,&#8221; Chandler said. &#8220;It was a series of cross-selling pitches. After a month or two, I canceled my account.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Rather than deceive, why not delight recipients?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chandlerwrites.com/2008/04/16/tom-chandler-quoted-in-brandweek-article-about-deceptive-mailing-practices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

